The Amazon Product Advertising API documentation provides some code samples for its use but none using ASP.NET. A personal interest brought me to play with it and as it wasn’t entirely trivial to create a signed request as required associate authentication I thought I’d share some working code samples.
The API does surface a WSDL file and as such a Web Reference could be used to generate classes to interact with the API. The sample I am providing here does not take advantage of this and is instead submitting raw REST requests.
I see the most valuable part of this sample as the request signing piece. This sample should not be seen as a best practice for interacting with the API but rather as a utility for request signing.
The order of the query string parameters that are included in the signed string is crucial. They must be ordered by character code (in practise this equates to alphabetically, but with all upper case letters coming before any lower case letters). The API documentation suggests string splitting, sorting, and string joining. This is definitely the approach I would take if you find yourself writing queries that use parameters dynamically but I struggle to see the use-case. This sample just uses a hard-coded string with the relevant parameters in the correct order.
Although I haven’t looked in detail yet, the approach taken to sign requests here appears very similar if not identical to that required by the Instagram API, and I am sure many other (social media) APIs.
Below you will find a class called the AmazonApiHelper. Further below is an ashx HttpHandler as an example of calling the utility functions provided by the helper class. You’ll need to provide you own values for the following constants: private const string awsSecretKey = "Your secret key goes here";
private const string awsAccessKeyId = "Your access key Id goes here";
private const string associateTag = "Your associate tag goes here";
Here is a short PowerShell function that can be used when you need to dynamically generate CAML queries with many logically joined statements. I actually adapted it from a C# implementation I wrote (which is probably more useful…) but as you can rewrite it in C# very easily I won’t bother bother posting it twice.
As CAML logical join operators (And, Or) can only compare two statements, when many statements need to be compared you must nest them which is what this function achieves. The $join parameter should be passed as “And” or “Or” and the $fragments parameter should be passed as an array of CAML statement strings such as: @("<Eq><FieldRef Name='Title' /><Value Type='Text'>title</Value></Eq>", "<Eq><FieldRef Name='FileLeafRef' /><Value Type='Text'>name.docx</Value></Eq>")
SharePoint was once known for it’s unfortunate list of quirky bugs. As of SharePoint 2010 there are definitely less of these to contend with but some still remain – like this one. The sort order for a list view can get rendered incorrectly when editing the view.
When you define a view programmatically it is up to you to create the XML which defines it. A common view query for a tasks list may be to show all items in descending order so that the newest tasks appear at the top of the list. As such:
This will update the view just as you or I would expect. However, there is a significant problem here. When a user modifies this view in the future (via the ViewEdit.aspx) the form will show the view is sorted on ID (correct) but the ‘Show items in ascending order’ radio button will be selected (incorrect). If the user now saves the form, perhaps having added another column, the incorrect sort order will be persisted. To avoid this issue you must capitalise the Ascending attribute value as such:
I recently had a requirement around linking to and downloading specific versions of documents stored in SharePoint. There is some rather quirky behaviour around SPFileVersion and how this is achieved and I felt it warranted a post.
The first thing to be aware of is that there are two distinct version collections: SPFileVersionCollection and SPListItemVersionCollection. These collections can be accessed via the respective assets as you would expect (SPFile.Versions and SPListItem.Versions) and, as is the way in SharePoint, are enumerations of SPFileVersion and SPListItemVersion objects, respectively. These objects, which represent the individual versions, have a number of similar properties and methods but do not share a base class nor an interface.
In order to access specific versions of documents, the approach I took was to store the VersionLabel (a property on both SPFileVersion and SPListItemVersion) and then retrieve the version by using this value in conjunction with GetVersionFromLabel (a method on both SPFileVersion and SPListItemVersion). This works but with a number of caveats:
SPFileVersionCollection does NOT contain an entry for the latest version. This means that if the document has only a single version then this collection will be empty. If you want to access the latest version you must verify that the version label refers to the latest version by comparing it to the first entry in the SPListItemVersionCollection and if it is then access the SPFile directly. If you are accessing properties that are also present on an SPListItemVersion (ie not opening a stream) you can use that collection instead but you must also take note of the next point.
SPListItemVersion.Url behaves unexpectedly in some situations. Assumedly this is to support directing underprivileged users away from minor versions that they are not allowed to see (although I don’t see how it achieves this), the Url for minor versions will be equal to that of the latest minor version when there is no published version. Always use SPFileVersion.Url.
Minor versions get promoted when published, breaking links to the minor version. Example – You have a document currently at version 0.2, with a previous 0.1 version. When you publish this document you still only have two versions: 0.1 and 1.0. You will now fail to locate version 0.2. Don’t be fooled into thinking that using the VersionId property will solve this issue. It simply represents the the version label as an integer (+1 for each minor version, +512 for each major version). The only way I could find to handle this case is to introduce the doc store version which is stored in the property bag of the SPFile: SPFile.Properties["vti_docstoreversion"]. You can see how this works by looking at the code examples I have included but if this specific case isn’t going to be an issue for you then don’t use it and enjoy cleaner code (see here). Also note that the doc store version is only stored in the SPFile property bag and not in the SPListItem property bag.
I have included some code to illustrate how this may be implemented:
Please leave a comment and if you want to keep reading more about SharePoint don’t forget to subscribe.